Table3 2 Treatment Tech Screening Matrix

Rating Codes  Above Average  Average  Below Average N/A - “Not Applicable” I/D - “Insufficient Data”  - Level of Effectiveness highly dependent upon specific con- taminant and its application Development StatusTreatment TrainO&MCapital System Reliability & Maintainability Relative CostsTime AvailabilityNonhalogenated VOC’s Halogenated VOC’s Nonhalogenated SVOC’s Halogenated SVOC’sFuels Inorganics RadionuclidesExplosives Soil, Sediment, Bedrock, and Sludge 3.1 In Situ Biological Treatment 4.1 Bioventing      4.2 Enhanced Bioremediation      4.3 Phytoremediation    3.2 In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment 4.4 Chemical Oxidation    4.5 Electrokinetic Separation  4.6 Fracturing  4.7 Soil Flushing  4.8 Soil Vapor Extraction  4.9 Solidification/Stabilization  3.3 In Situ Thermal Treatment 4.10 Thermal Treatment  3.4 Ex Situ Biological Treatment (assuming excavation) 4.11 Biopiles      4.12 Composting    4.13 Landfarming   4.14 Slurry Phase Biological Treatment      3.5 Ex Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (assuming excavation) 4.15 Chemical Extraction  4.16 Chemical Reduction /Oxidation  4.17 Dehalogenation  4.18 Separation  4.19 Soil Washing  4.20 Solidification/Stabilization  3.6 Ex Situ Thermal Treatment (assuming excavation) 4.21 Hot Gas Decontamination  4.22 Incineration  4.23 Open Burn/Open Detonation  4.24 Pyrolysis  4.25 Thermal Desorption  3.7 Containment 4.26 Landfill Cap  4.27 Landfill Cap Enhancements/Alternatives  3.8 Other Treatment 4.28 Excavation, Retrieval, Off-Site Disposal    Ground Water, Surface Water, and Leachate 3.9 In Situ Biological Treatment 4.29 Enhanced Bioremediation          4.30 Monitored Natural Attenuation    4.31 Phytoremediation    3.10 In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment 4.32 Air Sparging  4.33 Bioslurping  4.34 Chemical Oxidation    4.35 Directional Wells (enhancement)  4.36 Dual Phase Extraction  4.37 Thermal Treatment  4.38 Hydrofracturing Enhancements  4.39 In-Well Air Stripping  4.40 Passive/Reactive Treatment Walls    3.11 Ex Situ Biological Treatment 4.41 Bioreactors    4.42 Constructed Wetlands        3.12 Ex Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (assuming pumping) 4.43 Adsorption/ Absorption    4.44 Advanced Oxidation Processes    4.45 Air Stripping  4.46 Granulated Activated Carbon/Liquid Phase Carbon Adsorption     4.47 Groundwater Pumping/Pump & Treat    4.48 Ion Exchange  4.49 Precipitation/Coagulation/Flocculation  4.50 Separation    4.51 Sprinkler Irrigation  3.13 Containment 4.52 Physical Barriers  4.53 Deep Well Injection  3.14 Air Emissions/Off-Gas Treatment 4.54 Biofiltration  N/A      I/D  4.55 High Energy Destruction  N/AI/DI/D  I/D  I/D  4.56 Membrane Separation  N/AI/DI/D  I/D  I/D  4.57 Oxidation  N/A  I/D  I/D  4.58 Scrubbers  N/A  I/D  I/DI/D 4.59 Vapor Phase Carbon Adsorption  N/A  I/D  I/D  Relative Overall Cost & Performance Contaminants Treated Contaminants are classified into eight groups: Effectiveness Demonstrated at Pilot or Full Pilot or Full Scale Treatment Train Is the technology only effective as part of the treatment train? Relative overall cost and performance O&M Operation and Maintenance Intensive System Reliability /Maintainability The expected range of demonstrated reliability and maintenance relative to other effective technologies Relative Costs Design, construction, and operations and mainte- nance (O&M) costs of the core process that defines each and pre-and post-treatment Capital Capital Intensive Availability Number of vendors that can design, construct, and maintain the technology in situ soil groundwater ex situ soil Time Time required to clean up a “standard” site using the technology Stand-alone technology (not complex in terms of number of media/treatment technologies, maybe one “routine” technology in addition) Low degree of O&M intensity Low degree of capital investment High reliability and low maintenance Low degree of general costs relative to other options Less than 3 years Less than 0.5 year Less than 1 year Relatively simple (two-car train or so), and well understood, widely applied, etc. Average degree of O&M intensity Average degree of capital investment Average reliability and average maintenance Average degree of general costs relative to other options 2-4 vendors 3-10 years 0.5-1 year 1-3 years More than 4 vendors Fewer than 2 vendors Complex (more technologies, media to be treated, generates excessive waste, etc.) High degree of O&M intensity High degree of capital investment Low reliability and high maintenance High degree of general costs relative to other options More than 3 years for in situ soil More than 1 year for ex situ soil More than 10 years for water Development Status Scale status of an available technology Implemented as part of the final remedy at multiple sites, well documented, understood, etc. Has been implemented at full scale but still needs improvements, testing, etc. Not been fully implemented but has been tested (pilot, bench, lab scale) and is promising Factors  Above Average  Average  Below Average Other  Level of Effectiveness highly dependent upon specific contaminant and its application/ design N/A “Not Applicable” I/D “Insufficient Data” - Fuels - Inorganics - Radionuclides - Explosives - Nonhalogenated VOCs - Halogenated VOCs - Nonhalogenated SVOCs - Halogenated SVOCs Limited Effectiveness Demonstrated at Pilot or Full Scale No Demonstrated Effectiveness at Pilot or Full Scale Same as above Table 3-1: DefiniTion of SymbolS USeD in The TreaTmenT TechnologieS Screening maTrix Table 3-2: TreaTmenT TechnologieS Screening maTrix